both the quantity and the cost are zero. This is usually what you want,
but if you do only want to check whether the quantity is zero, you
can run mixedAmountStripPrices (or similar) before this.
(multiply|divide)(Mixed)?Amount now also multiply or divide the
TotalPrice if it is present, and the old
(multiply|divide)(Mixed)?AmountAndPrice functions are removed.
internally, closing a big space leak.
This also now combines Amounts with TotalPrices in the same commodity
when normalising; amounts with TotalPrices were previously never
combined.
aquantity.
Journal entries still require a positive @@ price, but now the sign is
set after parsing, rather than when converting in amountToCost.
The reason for this change is that, if we're going to perform arithmetic
on Amount with TotalCost, then the presence of aquantity=0 means that
amountToCost would render the total cost as 0, because signum 0 == 0.
This makes journal entries like the following impossible to balance:
2000-01-01
a 0 @@ 10 A
b -10 A
add --debug=1 shows the top hits for similar past transactions.
added:
Hledger.Cli.Utils.journalSimilarTransaction
provides --debug=1 output
changed:
Hledger.Cli.Commands.Add.transactionsSimilarTo -> Hledger.Data.Journal.journalTransactionsSimilarTo
now takes an extra number-of-results argument
It would not add the tag when a comment already existed.
This affected hledger-print-location.hs and probably
the generated-transaction: tag in periodic transactions.
For clarity; infer-value was too vague. The old spelling remains
supported for compatibility, but is now deprecated.
When typing, --infer-market or even --infer (for now) is sufficient.
On the accounts screen and register screen we round amounts according
to commodity styles, but when you drill down to a transaction you
probably want to see the unrounded amounts.
Ensures parseable and more sensible-looking output in more cases, and behaves more like Ledger's print.
There is still an issue with adding trailing zeroes, which would be nice to prevent.
independently.
You can now combine costing and valuation, for example "--cost
--value=then" will first convert to costs, and then value according to
the "--value=then" strategy. Any valuation strategy can be used with or
without costing.
If multiple valuation and costing strategies are specified on the
command line, then if any of them include costing
(-B/--cost/--value=cost) then amounts will be converted to cost, and for
valuation strategy the rightmost will be used.
--value=cost is deprecated, but still supported and is equivalent to
--cost/-B. --value=cost,COMM is no longer supported, but this behaviour can be
achieved with "--cost --value=then,COMM".
costing and valuation.
This currently is given a dummy NoCost argument and is equivalent to
"maybe id (*ApplyValuation ...)", but provides a constant interface so
that internal behaviour can be changed freely.
Also adds a postingDate argument to amountApplyValuation, and re-orders
the ValuationType and (Transaction/Posting) arguments to
(transaction/posting)ApplyValuation, to be consistent with
amountApplyValuation.
Searching for prices during valuation no longer now properly excludes
price loops, avoiding near infinite looping with certain
configurations of market prices. Also we now always use a direct price
when available, rather than searching unnecessarily.
Price searching progress info, useful for troubleshooting, is now
displayed with --debug=2.
There could still be some corner cases we don't handle correctly. We
now give up with an error message if the searched price chains get too
long (> 1000). More importantly, we should also give up if the search
iterates too many times, but this is not done yet.
