A single transaction can be added by PUT to /add.
(I read that PUT, not POST, should be used to create;
perhaps the web add form should also use PUT ?)
As with the web form, the `add` capability is required (and enabled by
default).
Here's how to test with curl:
$ curl -s http://127.0.0.1:5000/add -X PUT -H 'Content-Type: application/json' --data-binary @in.json; echo
New readJsonFile/writeJsonFile helpers in Hledger.Web.Json
are handy for generating test data. Eg:
>>> writeJsonFile "in.json" (head $ jtxns samplejournal)
These have been an adhoc mixture of plain text, markdown and org, and
used in each mode at different times. They will now have a definite
format, which for now is markdown. Org was another contender.
[ci skip]
base-compat-batteries provides the same API across more ghc versions
than base-compat does, at the cost of more dependencies. Eg it exports
Prelude.Compat ((<>)) with ghc 7.10/base 4.8, which we expect.
My belief is that several of our deps already require it so the added
cost is not too great. We should probably go back to base-compat when
possible though, eg when we stop supporting ghc 7.10.
We don't need to import Data.Monoid because Prelude.Compat exports "<>"
already. In fact, importing that module causes build failures:
Hledger/Read/Common.hs:725:62: error:
Ambiguous occurrence ‘<>’
It could refer to either ‘Sem.<>’,
imported from ‘Prelude.Compat’ at Hledger/Read/Common.hs:97:1-39
(and originally defined in ‘Data.Semigroup’)
or ‘Data.Monoid.<>’,
imported from ‘Data.Monoid’ at Hledger/Read/Common.hs:110:1-18
Fixes https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/issues/794.
It's rare that my deps break their api or that newer versions must be avoided,
and very common that they release new versions which I must tediously
and promptly test and release hackage revisions for or risk falling out
of stackage. Trying it this way for a bit.
