401 lines
		
	
	
		
			13 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			401 lines
		
	
	
		
			13 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
hledger project notes
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
"...simplicity of design was the most essential, guiding principle.
 | 
						|
Clarity of concepts, economy of features, efficiency and reliability of
 | 
						|
implementations were its consequences." --Niklaus Wirth
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
"The competent programmer is fully aware of the limited size of his own
 | 
						|
skull. He therefore approaches his task with full humility, and avoids
 | 
						|
clever tricks like the plague." --Edsger Dijkstra
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* to do
 | 
						|
** errors
 | 
						|
*** -B not working
 | 
						|
*** balance 'assets.*fargo' shows no accounts
 | 
						|
*** not catching some unbalanced entries, two ways:
 | 
						|
**** 1
 | 
						|
1/1 test1
 | 
						|
    a             $-100
 | 
						|
    b        -10h @ $10
 | 
						|
; $ hledger -B reg -- test1
 | 
						|
; 2009/01/01 test1                a                          $-100.00     $-100.00
 | 
						|
**** 2
 | 
						|
1/1 test2
 | 
						|
    a             $-100
 | 
						|
    b             $-100
 | 
						|
; $ hledger -B reg -- test2
 | 
						|
; 2009/01/01 test2                a                          $-100.00     $-100.00
 | 
						|
;                                 b                          $-100.00     $-200.00
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
*** register report should sort by date
 | 
						|
*** timelog report for today with no entries ignores an open session from yesterday
 | 
						|
*** balance report: zero-balance root accounts do not elide properly
 | 
						|
*** too many dependencies, hard to install esp. without cabal install
 | 
						|
** features
 | 
						|
*** more ledger features
 | 
						|
**** -U --uncleared
 | 
						|
**** actual/effective entry & txn dates, for more accurate modelling & easier reconciliation
 | 
						|
**** ~/.hledgerrc for setting defaults
 | 
						|
**** support complete period syntax ?
 | 
						|
    every N days     # N is any integer
 | 
						|
    every N weeks
 | 
						|
    every N months
 | 
						|
    every N quarters
 | 
						|
    every N years
 | 
						|
    biweekly
 | 
						|
    bimonthly
 | 
						|
**** allow - before currency symbol ?
 | 
						|
*** new features
 | 
						|
**** a simpler timelog balance report format for clients
 | 
						|
**** more date syntax: last nov, next friday, optional this, week of
 | 
						|
**** allow comment lines immediately after or within an entry
 | 
						|
**** accept multiple -f files
 | 
						|
**** more reliable tidy layout from print
 | 
						|
**** -Q quarterly interval option, for consistency/convenience ?
 | 
						|
**** web gui
 | 
						|
**** charts
 | 
						|
**** easier data entry
 | 
						|
**** parse more file formats - gnucash, qif, ofx, csv..
 | 
						|
**** parse in-progress timelog entries
 | 
						|
**** split day-spanning timelog sessions, don't report more than 24 hours in a day
 | 
						|
**** easy timelog queries when called as "hours"
 | 
						|
**** i18n
 | 
						|
*** speed
 | 
						|
**** more optimisation
 | 
						|
**** speed regression tests
 | 
						|
**** cache file ?
 | 
						|
** tests
 | 
						|
*** test all esoteric ledger file features
 | 
						|
*** wanted: a test for reading a ledger from stdin
 | 
						|
*** easy ledger compatibility testing
 | 
						|
**** --compare to compare (xml?) output with ledger with same args
 | 
						|
** docs
 | 
						|
*** hledgerisms in file format - that hledger can read but ledger can't
 | 
						|
*** complete docs for smart dates, period expressions
 | 
						|
*** funding
 | 
						|
**** original document
 | 
						|
=======
 | 
						|
funding
 | 
						|
=======
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
vision
 | 
						|
======
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     How to grow the hledger project ?
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     I'm looking for ways to fund active and sustainable hledger
 | 
						|
     development by me and others.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     A secondary goal is to develop new sustainable models and processes
 | 
						|
     for funding free software developers and other community projects.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     This is sometimes the point in a free sw project's development where
 | 
						|
     the project leader seemingly loses the plot, alienates contributors
 | 
						|
     and destroys the community's good-will dynamic.  I've seen it many
 | 
						|
     times, but a few have succeeded and I want to be one of them - so
 | 
						|
     that I can eat, have a modicum of stability and do my best work in
 | 
						|
     service to the community.  At worst, I'll look bad but the project
 | 
						|
     will still be out there. At best I'll live more easily and joyfully
 | 
						|
     while serving the cause of Financial Solvency!
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     So I'm beginning by posting these notes and inviting your thoughts -
 | 
						|
     as much or as little as folks want to give. How could we do this 
 | 
						|
     so that all benefit ?
 | 
						|
     
 | 
						|
funding models
 | 
						|
==============
 | 
						|
     Brainstorming some possible funding models & processes.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * grants
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      How to find possible grant sources ?
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * con
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * getting grant funding is a whole new field to study
 | 
						|
       * slow and time intensive, I imagine
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * donations
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Solicit donations.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * pro
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * simple
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * con
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * often difficult
 | 
						|
       * donators do not feel a direct benefit
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * shareware
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Release the project under a non-free license, requiring commercial
 | 
						|
      users to pay the fee on an honour basis (eg).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * pro
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * flexible, low administration, encourages trust
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * con
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * effectively closed-source ? would inhibit collaboration
 | 
						|
       * benefit is still indirect, only a proportion will pay
 | 
						|
       * enforcement/guilt may come into play
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * limited-time premium branch
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      The funded version of hledger gets some desirable premium features
 | 
						|
      before the free version and is closed-source.  Funders/customers pay
 | 
						|
      a fixed price for immediate access to the funded version.  Yearly, a
 | 
						|
      new funded version is released and the old funded version is merged
 | 
						|
      into the free version.  (To gain experience it could be done on a
 | 
						|
      smaller scale, eg monthly/quarterly.)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * pro
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * all features reach community, predictably
 | 
						|
       * customers are also community funders
 | 
						|
       * customers receive direct benefit from paying
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * con
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * free sw developers compete/outshine the premium branch
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * bounties
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Some (or all) feature, bugfix, project management or other tasks are
 | 
						|
      published with a bounty attached.  When the bounty is paid by one or
 | 
						|
      more funders, the task is performed and delivered. Or, bounty is paid
 | 
						|
      on completion of task (honour system).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * pro
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * funders receive direct benefit
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * bounties using fundable.org (eg)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      A more organised form of the above, perhaps facilitating trust,
 | 
						|
      co-funding and larger bounties.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * pro
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * proven process developed by others
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * con
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * fundable takes a cut
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * hosted service
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Offer hosted and managed ledgers, perhaps with premium features, for
 | 
						|
      a monthly fee
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * pro
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
       * proven model
 | 
						|
       * clear benefit to customers, especially non-technies
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      * con
 | 
						|
 
 | 
						|
       * success of free/self-installed version competes with hosting service
 | 
						|
       * some will avoid web-hosting their financial data
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * customisation
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Offer per-user customisations, possibly to be merged in the trunk,
 | 
						|
      for a fee
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * support
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Offer user/developer support for a fee
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * training
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Offer application and/or financial training for a fee
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * profit sharing/tithing
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Each period (quarter, half-year, year), donate 10% (eg) to project
 | 
						|
      contributors and/or supporting projects
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * transparent funding
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      Funding and usage of funds is published on the web as a ledger
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * opaque funding
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
      All funding and spending need not be made public
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
strengths
 | 
						|
=========
 | 
						|
     hledger has some aptitudes in this area:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    * hledger deals with money => hledger users will tend to have some money
 | 
						|
    * hledger's purpose is to increase financial success => users will feel its value to their bottom line
 | 
						|
    * hledger is a tool that can support project funding, eg by publishing community funding data
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
weaknesses
 | 
						|
==========
 | 
						|
    * hledger doesn't have a nice ui yet
 | 
						|
    * hledger has a limited featureset
 | 
						|
    * hledger requires work, eg data entry and chart of accounts maintenance
 | 
						|
    * hledger is geeky
 | 
						|
    * there is competition
 | 
						|
    * hledger has no compelling market niche (aside from payment-averse free software users)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
competitors/fellow niche inhabitants
 | 
						|
====================================
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    * web apps
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * netsuite
 | 
						|
     * sql-ledger, ledgersmb
 | 
						|
     * wesabe
 | 
						|
     * ...
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    * desktop apps
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
     * quickbooks
 | 
						|
     * quicken
 | 
						|
     * ms money
 | 
						|
     * grisbi
 | 
						|
     * gnucash
 | 
						|
     * excel
 | 
						|
     * ledger!
 | 
						|
     * ...
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
*** --version
 | 
						|
*** --help
 | 
						|
*** readme
 | 
						|
**** keep in sync (automate)
 | 
						|
***** README file
 | 
						|
***** hledger.hs module description
 | 
						|
***** hledger.cabal description field (exclude home page link)
 | 
						|
***** home page description (http://joyful.com/Hledger/editform)
 | 
						|
***** mail list description (http://groups.google.com/groups/hledger -> edit welcome msg)
 | 
						|
***** gmane description
 | 
						|
***** darcsweb description
 | 
						|
*** announcements
 | 
						|
**** generate from README and NEWS
 | 
						|
*** release notes
 | 
						|
**** NEWS
 | 
						|
*** implementation docs
 | 
						|
*** api docs
 | 
						|
*** developer intro
 | 
						|
**** style tips
 | 
						|
***** we aim to make reliable software:
 | 
						|
****** fixes come before features
 | 
						|
****** "bugs" get called "errors", as in "the programmer messed up"
 | 
						|
****** we test continuously and thoroughly (code, doc & speed tests on each checkin)
 | 
						|
****** less is more
 | 
						|
*** user manual
 | 
						|
*** differences not noted in README
 | 
						|
**** ledger shows description comments as part of description
 | 
						|
**** ledger seems to get amounts' x-position wrong more than hledger
 | 
						|
**** ledger can't parse full smart dates in display expressions
 | 
						|
**** hledger print puts a blank line after the entry, not before it
 | 
						|
**** ledger can get timelog entry balance wrong, see mail list
 | 
						|
**** ledger reports timelog sessions as virtual transactions
 | 
						|
** web presence
 | 
						|
*** clarify bugtracking process
 | 
						|
* misc
 | 
						|
** things I want to know
 | 
						|
*** time
 | 
						|
where have I been spending my time in recent weeks ?
 | 
						|
where have I spent my time today ?
 | 
						|
what is my status wrt spending plan for this week/month/year ?
 | 
						|
what is my current status wrt time spending goals ?
 | 
						|
*** money
 | 
						|
where have I been spending my money ?
 | 
						|
what is my status wrt spending plan for this week/month/year ?
 | 
						|
what is my current status wrt spending/savings goals ?
 | 
						|
what are all my current balances ?
 | 
						|
what does my balance history look like ?
 | 
						|
what does my balance future look like ?
 | 
						|
are there any cashflow, tax, budgetary problems looming ?
 | 
						|
*** charts
 | 
						|
[1:27pm] <sm> I have decided I am not getting enough visible day-to-day value out of my ledger, I need more of that to stay motivated
 | 
						|
[1:27pm] <Nafai> What do you think will help in that?
 | 
						|
[1:27pm] <sm> I think some simple self-updating charts, or even good reports in a visible place
 | 
						|
[1:28pm] <sm> something I don't have to spend an hour fiddling with to get answers
 | 
						|
[1:38pm] <sm> Nafai: identifying/designing some useful reports/charts seems to be blocking me
 | 
						|
[1:39pm] <sm> there are probably some standard ones I should use
 | 
						|
[1:40pm] <sm> a graph of daily net worth is probably one of the simplest
 | 
						|
[1:58pm] <sm> what else.. a chart of weekly expenses in key categories
 | 
						|
[1:58pm] <sm> ditto, monthly
 | 
						|
[1:58pm] <sm> a chart of monthly income
 | 
						|
[1:59pm] <sm> those three should help me be more clear about cashflow status
 | 
						|
[2:00pm] <sm> also I'd like something that shows me how much I am on top of financial tracking - how current my numbers are, when last reconciled etc - at a glance
 | 
						|
[2:01pm] <sm> another simple one: current balances in all accounts
 | 
						|
[2:01pm] <sm> those would be a great start
 | 
						|
[2:04pm] <sm> daily net worth, weekly expense, monthly expense, monthly income, confidence/currentness report, and balance report
 | 
						|
[2:05pm] <sm> let's see, which of those 6 would give most payoff right now
 | 
						|
[2:05pm] <sm> probably 5
 | 
						|
[2:06pm] <sm> how could I measure that ?
 | 
						|
[2:06pm] <sm> number of days since last ledger entry..
 | 
						|
[2:06pm] <sm> number of ledger entries in last 30 days (compared to average)
 | 
						|
[2:07pm] <sm> number of days since last cleared checking entry (indicating an online reconcile)
 | 
						|
[2:08pm] <sm> those would be a good start. How do I make those visual
 | 
						|
[2:09pm] <sm> well I guess the first step is a script to print them
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
** compare other languages! a parser generator and decent speed is required
 | 
						|
*** python: http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/ZestyParser, pysec, pyparsing
 | 
						|
*** squeak: LanguageGame, T-Gen, SmaCC
 | 
						|
*** lisp: ?
 | 
						|
*** ruby: too slow (?)
 | 
						|
** data representation
 | 
						|
*** http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0327/
 | 
						|
*** http://www.n-heptane.com/nhlab/repos/Decimal/
 | 
						|
*** http://www.n-heptane.com/nhlab/repos/Decimal/Money.hs
 | 
						|
*** http://www2.hursley.ibm.com/decimal/
 | 
						|
** lispy's template haskell for quickcheck
 | 
						|
-- find tests with template haskell
 | 
						|
import Language.Haskell.Parser
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
{-# OPTIONS_GHC -fno-warn-unused-imports -no-recomp -fth #-}
 | 
						|
{- ghc --make Unit.hs -main-is Unit.runTests -o unit -}
 | 
						|
runTests :: IO ()
 | 
						|
runTests = $(mkChecks props)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
mkChecks []        = undefined
 | 
						|
mkChecks [name]    = mkCheck name
 | 
						|
mkChecks (name:ns) = [| $(mkCheck name) >> $(mkChecks ns) |]
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
mkCheck name = [| putStr (name ++ ": ") >> quickCheck $(varE (mkName name)) |]
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
{- | looks in Tests.hs for functions like prop_foo and returns
 | 
						|
  the list.  Requires that Tests.hs be valid Haskell98. -}
 | 
						|
props :: [String]
 | 
						|
props = unsafePerformIO $
 | 
						|
  do h <- openFile "Tests.hs" ReadMode
 | 
						|
     s <- hGetContents h
 | 
						|
     case parseModule s of
 | 
						|
       (ParseOk (HsModule _ _ _ _ ds)) -> return (map declName (filter isProp ds))
 | 
						|
       (ParseFailed loc s')            -> error (s' ++ " " ++ show loc)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
{- | checks if function binding name starts with @prop_@ indicating
 | 
						|
 that it is a quickcheck property -}
 | 
						|
isProp :: HsDecl -> Bool
 | 
						|
isProp d@(HsFunBind _) = "prop_" `isPrefixOf` (declName d)
 | 
						|
isProp _ = False
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
{- | takes an HsDecl and returns the name of the declaration -}
 | 
						|
declName :: HsDecl -> String
 | 
						|
declName (HsFunBind (HsMatch _ (HsIdent name) _ _ _:_)) = name
 | 
						|
declName _                                              = undefined
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
** snippets
 | 
						|
-- trace a MixedAmount
 | 
						|
matrace :: MixedAmount -> MixedAmount
 | 
						|
matrace a@(Mixed as) = trace (show as) a
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
-- normalise and trace a MixedAmount
 | 
						|
nmatrace :: MixedAmount -> MixedAmount
 | 
						|
nmatrace a = trace (show as) a where (Mixed as) = normaliseMixedAmount a
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
** http://lwn.net/Articles/314577/
 | 
						|
** financial software
 | 
						|
*** http://weberp.org
 | 
						|
**** http://www.weberp.org/weberp/doc/Manual/ManualContents.php
 |