a7f6b551c5
Of the 2 tests, the first is a simple test on a specific period. The second is expected to fail at this point until the new upcoming code to fix the issue with the history option is implemented. For the record : this issue happens when we use the -H flag for a period that does not contain any transactions. Currently, the ending balance values are only taken into account if the current period contains a Transaction containing one of the previous populated accounts. For example, if we have a statement on the 2008/01/01 for $1 and we do a command (with -H) to check the value on the (without transactions) 2008/01/02, we will not get the $1 from 2008/01/01. In that same example, if we had a transaction for the same account as 2008/01/01 in say 2008/01/03 then the -H command would successfully show the statement from 2008/01/03 with the initial amount that we set in 2008/01/01. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Data | ||
| Read | ||
| Reports | ||
| Utils | ||
| Data.hs | ||
| Query.hs | ||
| Read.hs | ||
| Reports.hs | ||
| Utils.hs | ||