11 KiB
DOCS
An overview of hledger’s documentation structure and maintenance procedures, for developers and maintainers. (For user documentation, see Docs. For all developer documentation, see Developer docs.)
Documentation structure
“There is a secret that needs to be understood in order to write good software documentation: there isn’t one thing called documentation, there are four. They are: tutorials, how-to guides, explanation and technical reference. They represent four different purposes or functions, and require four different approaches to their creation.” –[Daniele Procida] (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21289832)
2019: out of date, needs update.
Project documentation lives in a number of places:
site/*.mdis the hledger.org website content, which is generated with hakyll[-std] and pandoc- haddock documentation in the code appears on Hackage
- short blurbs: cabal files, module headers, HCAR, GSOC project, ..
doc/notes.orghas some old developer notes- developer reports (profiles, benchmarks, coverage..) in doc/profs, sometimes published at hledger.org/profs
- https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/tree/master/doc
site/ is now a symlink to the separate hledger_site repo.
See also Shake.hs.
hledger doc files can be divided into several groups:
Project admin/dev notes not published on the website. These are kept in this directory (doc/). They include:
doc/finance/ project finances doc/hcar/ Haskell Community and Activities Report entries doc/lib.m4 common macros used in package manuals doc/manpage.* misc. templates for rendering package manuals doc/mockups/ exploratory developer mockups doc/profs/ a place for long-term profiling/performance dataProject doc files required to be in the top directory:
README.md the main project readme, displayed on github LICENSE the default project licenseCode/API docs in haskell source files as haddock comments:
hledger*/**/*.hs haddock module and function docs in most source filesPer-package descriptions, readmes, changelogs, and reference manuals. These are in the respective package directories:
hledger*/package.yaml source for package metadata (description, etc.) hledger*/README package readme, displayed on hackage hledger*/CHANGES package changelog, displayed on hackage hledger*/hledger*.m4.md package manual source file(s)The project website and additional docs - home page, FAQ, tutorials, how-tos, developer guide, etc. These are in the site directory:
site/ hledger.org website content, templates, assets
Workflows
Last updated: 2025-09
Compile the Shake script
Shake.hs automates some doc maintenance tasks
(complementing Justfile). Most contributors don’t need to
use it, but if you do, compile it like so: in the hledger repo, run:
$ ./Shake.hs
Update options help
Edit general options definitions in
hledger/Hledger/Cli/CliOptions.hs and command options
definitions in hledger/Hledger/Cli/Commands/*.hs.
Update manuals’ content
Updates and fixes for the manuals’ content are welcome and encouraged! They can be committed together with related code changes, or separately.
The manuals have (a) source files, kept in the hledger repo and (b)
generated files derived from those. Don’t edit the generated files, such
as: - hledger/hledger.md or
hledger-ui/hledger-ui.md in the hledger repo -
site/src/1.50/hledger*.md or
site/src/dev/hledger*.md in the hledger_site repo
Instead, edit the source files: - hledger/hledger.m4.md
or hledger/Hledger/Cli/Commands/*.md for the hledger manual
- hledger-ui/hledger-ui.m4.md for the hledger-ui manual -
hledger-web/hledger-web.m4.md for the hledger-web
manual.
(There are a few more source files which change less often; if you click “edit this page” on a recent release manual on the website, you’ll see all source files listed.)
Update manuals’ generated files
Contributors don’t need to do this; usually it’s done periodically by the maintainer. It requires unix tools such as m4, makeinfo and pandoc.
In the hledger repo: first, set current year and month for the man pages:
$ just mandates
Then update the lists of command line options in the manuals’ source files (only as needed, if command line options or option help have changed):
$ stack build && ./Shake cmddocs -c
Then regenerate the text, man, info, and markdown manuals in hledger*/ from their source files:
$ ./Shake manuals -c
Update dev manuals on the website
When updates to manuals’ generated files land in the master branch of the hledger repo on github, the dev manuals on hledger.org will update automatically.
(The manuals on the website are rendered from
site/src/VERSION/*.md in the hledger_site repo, which are
symlinked copies of hledger/hledger.md,
hledger-ui/hledger-ui.md and
hledger-web/hledger-web.md in the hledger repo.)
Update release manuals on the website
Contributors can do this, but doing it the right way is a little complicated; you can also ask the maintainer to do it.
The release manuals on the website are rendered from
site/src/1.50/*.md, site/src/1.43/*.md, etc.
These are generated as follows:
In the hledger repo, with the hledger_site repo symlinked as
./site;
for each major release REL that needs updating:
- Cherry pick the manuals’ content updates for REL (not generated
files updates) from
mastertoREL-branch - In master, run
just site-manuals-snapshot RELto update the release manuals in the site repo.
When these commits land in the hledger_site repo on github, the release manuals on hledger.org will update automatically.
Add new release manuals to the website
A few extra steps are needed the first time new release’s manuals are added to the site, to update redirects and the version links shown at the top of manuals:
- In the site repo, update and push version numbers in Makefile, site.js, hledger.org.caddy
- On hledger.org, restart the web server
- On cloudflare, purge hledger.org/site.js from the cache
Update hledger binaries with latest docs
This ensures the hledger dev executables are embedding the latest
manuals’ generated files, affecting: - options help displayed by
--help - command docs displayed by CMD --help
- manuals displayed by help, --info, and
--man.
Update the options help, manuals’ content and manuals’ generated files as above, then rebuild:
$ stack build
Update change logs
Changelogs are in **/CHANGES.md (one in each package,
and one at top level for the project). They should ideally be updated
continually (at least weekly), in master, taking advantage of fresh
memory and context. At release time they get some extra polish, and are
propagated to the release branch. Note once the release branch is
created, extra care is needed to keep the changelogs in sync: - sync
change notes corresponding to any code changes synced between master and
release branch - sync change note updates between both branches.
To update changelogs, in master or in a release branch:
Add new draft change notes to all changelogs (based on commit messages since the release or commit id mentioned in their first heading):
$ just changelogsEdit and polish the new change notes.
Add issue number links, eg with
md-issue-refsmacro.Commit, eg with
just changelogs -c
Finalise change logs for a release
In the release branch, on the day of release, run this to add release headings and commit:
$ just changelogs-finalise
Update release notes
Release notes are in doc/relnotes.md in the hledger repo
(and symlinked as site/src/relnotes.md in the site repo).
They are generated at release time, from the finalised change logs. Note
once the release notes are generated, they should be kept in sync with
any late updates to the changelogs (by regenerating them).
To update release notes:
In the release branch, with change logs finalised, run
$ just relnotesReview the new release notes. Add a summary of changes at the top.
Update release notes on github
Release notes are uploaded to each github release, with some additional github-specific release docs.
In the release branch, once the corresponding github release is created, after updating release notes:
If needed, update github release docs in
doc/ghrelnotes.Push this and the latest release notes to the github release:
$ just ghrel-notes
Update release notes on the website
- Cherry pick the latest release notes (
doc/relnotes.md) from the release branch to master. - Push to the master branch on github. The website’s “Release notes” page will update automatically.
Diagrams
201901 docs reorg (#920, WIP)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/hledger/t2nVr3zER8Q/discussion
On Oct 26, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Simon Michael simon@joyful.com wrote:
A quick heads-up: I am feeling like stepping back from github wiki, and reorganising our docs like so:
Two repos:
- hledger - code and hard docs
- code and code docs (haddock docs & doctest examples)
- developer docs (READMEs in md or org format)
- product manuals (hledger/hledger.m4.md)
- release notes and announcements
- HCAR entries
- hledger-site - website and soft docs
- hledger.org content, resources, site infrastructure
- user cookbook, how-tos, articles
- links to blog posts, discussions etc.
- other resources relating to our web presence/marketing
If you disagree, let’s discuss. Some quick considerations:
- moving docs to the wiki hasn’t affected the contribution rate
- using the wiki increases our dependence on github and makes our work less self-contained and future-proof
- the wiki docs don’t look great, aren’t very flexible, & don’t integrate well with our site & static docs
- using two docs systems increases complexity
- dev docs in the wiki are too far from the code, and compete with READMEs
PS:
- Why not go back to just one repo for everything ? Or if two repos, why not put all docs in one of them ?
Dev docs are most discoverable and maintainable right there in the main repo, ie as READMEs. Likewise for API docs (haddocks) and the reference manuals (hledger/hledgerm4.md). We want all of these updated in lock step with code/tooling changes.
Other (“soft”) docs are needed, but these have a more relaxed process, schedule, and scope (eg bookkeeping advice). They occasionally generate a lot of noise in the commit log, and I think it’s a good to keep that out of the code history. The website (home and other pages, site design, site infrastructure) generates similar commit storms and is somewhat independent of code, so it goes in the soft docs repo too.
These are my thoughts, but I have an open mind if you see a better way.
me (Simon Michael (sm) change)10/27/18 Still plenty of time to discuss and reconsider, but see also https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/issues/920 https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/issues/921
I’ll probably make a start on the first one (consolidating dev docs in main repo).
